Thanks to Ken for pointing this one out!
The question was suggested by Pyr's editor-in-chief, Lou Anders, and it spawned an interesting discussion.
Two of the most highly regarded fantasy authors - Tolkien and Lewis - were also Christians, whereas the fathers of science fiction were atheists, and SF itself, it could be argued, grew out of Darwinism and other notions of deep time. Is science fiction antithetical to religion?
Check it out on SF Signal!
Follow us!
Pages
Speculative Fiction Authors
- Joe Abercrombie
- Dan Abnett
- Daniel Abraham
- Saladin Ahmed
- Paolo Bacigalupi
- Iain M. Banks
- James Barclay
- Bradley P. Beaulieu
- Peter V. Brett
- Terry Brooks
- Tobias S. Buckell
- Jim Butcher
- Jacqueline Carey
- Blake Charlton
- David Constantine
- Stephen R. Donaldson
- Hal Duncan
- David Anthony Durham
- David Louis Edelman
- Steven Erikson
- S. L. Farrell
- Raymond E. Feist
- Jeffrey Ford
- C. S. Friedman
- Neil Gaiman
- William Gibson
- Peter F. Hamilton
- Tracy Hickman
- Robin Hobb
- Mark Hodder
- Charlie Huston
- J. V. Jones
- Guy Gavriel Kay
- Jasper Kent
- Kay Kenyon
- Stephen King
- Katherine Kurtz
- Mark Lawrence
- Sergey Lukyanenko
- Scott Lynch
- George R. R. Martin
- Robert McCammon
- Ian McDonald
- China Miéville
- L. E. Modesitt, jr.
- Michael Moorcock
- Richard Morgan
- Haruki Murakami
- Mark Charan Newton
- Naomi Novik
- Nnedi Okorafor
- K. J. Parker
- Tim Powers
- Terry Pratchett
- Melanie Rawn
- Alastair Reynolds
- Patrick Rothfuss
- Brian Ruckley
- Brandon Sanderson
- Courtney Schafer
- Ken Scholes
- Ekaterina Sedia
- Joel Shepherd
- Dan Simmons
- Melinda Snodgrass
- Jeff Somers
- Jon Sprunk
- Neal Stephenson
- Sam Sykes
- Adrian Tchaikovsky
- Ian Tregillis
- Carrie Vaughn
- Peter Watts
- Brent Weeks
- Margaret Weis
- David J. Williams
- Tad Williams
- Jack Whyte
- Chris Wooding
- Carlos Ruiz Zafón
SFF Resources
SFF Message Boards
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
|
By:
Patrick
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Index of Reviews and Interviews
About Me
Followers
SFF Blogs of Interest
- A Dribble of Ink
- A Fantasy Reader
- Adventures in Reading
- Bibliophile Stalker
- Dark Wolf Fantasy Reviews
- Dave Brendon's Fantasy & Scifi Weblog
- Debuts and Reviews
- Drying Ink
- Falcata Times
- Fantasy Book Critic
- Fantasy Faction
- Fantasy Literature
- Fantasy Magazine
- Feminist SF
- Forbidden Planet
- George R. R. Martin's Not A Blog
- Graeme's Fantasy Book Reviews
- Grasping for the Wind
- Iceberg Ink
- King of the Nerds
- Mysterious Outposts
- OF Blog of the Fallen
- Only the Best Science Fiction & Fantasy
- Pyr-o-Mania
- R. S. Bakker's Three Pound Brain
- Rob's Blog o' Stuff
- Sandstorm Reviews
- Scifi Chick
- ScifiGuy
- Speculative Book Review
- Speculative Fiction Junkie
- Speculative Fiction Junkie
- Speculative Horizons
- SQT Fantasy-Scifi Girl
- Staffer's Musings
- Stomping on Yeti
- The Agony Column
- The Bodhisattva
- The Book Smugglers
- The Book Swede
- The Genre Files
- The Green Man Review
- The Mad Hatter's Bookshelf & Book Review
- The Neth Space
- The Night Bazaar
- The Ranting Dragon
- The Soulless Machine Review
- The Speculative Scotsman
- The Stamp (of Approval)
- The Wertzone
- The World in a Satin Bag
- Walker of Worlds
- When Gravity Fails
Publishers
15 commentaires:
There's a really good argument in a recent book, the History of Science Fiction, by Adam Roberts, that Science Fiction and Fantasy split as a genre with the split of catholicism and protestantism.
I personally think science fiction is antithetical to rigid thinking and therefore most organized religions. That is, I think it is the government of the various religions that has more to fear from science fiction than the belief systems themselves. Regardless of what you believe, you will find justifications and arguments against it in just about any sci fi you pick up, since humans are exceedingly adept at finding what they are looking for.
I certainly hope so--it's the main reason I read science fiction. And that might also explain why I never liked Lewis or Tolkien.
It's curious that no women were answering that question.
Well, I'm a female agnostic who reads both Fantasy and Science Fiction. :)
Btw, I love Tolkien's books (except The Hobbit that's too much a children's book) but could never get into Narnia.
One famous female sf writer friend stated she was too busy birthin' babies, washin' dishes, and generally workin' to be bothered rehashing this old chestnut yet once again.
Additionally, of course, female sf/f writers do it all backwards and wearing stilettos too. (Thanks to Ginger Rogers when she was asked how she danced with Fred Astaire. "I do everything he does, except I do it backwards, wearing high heels."
You can't accuse da wimmin of not having a sense of humor!
I'm a Christian who loves fantasy and science fiction and I don't feel threatened by even the more stringent agnostic/atheist writers out there.
For example, one of my current "Buy their next book sight unseen" authors is Robert Charles Wilson, who is very much anti-religion (to read interviews with him). I love all of his writing and stand in awe of his ability to verbalize the evidence of things beyond human understanding (see "Spin" and "The Chronoliths" for starters).
The one thing that science fiction does that directly mirrors religion is nurture that longing and belief that we're not alone. That there's SOMEthing out there. That there's some reason for all of this. That there's some BEGINNING.
I've lost count of how many discussions/debates/arguments I've had with friends and family who believe there IS a God out there, just not the one revealed in the Bible. Even if people don't want to believe in the Jewish-Christian God, they know instinctively that there's something bigger than us out there. (and I've heard all the arguments about 'faith' being nothing more than a chemical reaction in the brain or mass hallucinations or fill-in-the-blank on your explanation du jour).
In the end, it's all about faith. The personal proof that I have for my faith is (for me) undeniable and unassailable. On the other side, there are people that are equally POSITIVE that their understanding of the universe is undeniable and unassailable. I don't deny that their proof is 100% real to them. But in the end, whether science or religion, it all comes down to the faith you put in your own experiences and the faith you put in the 'proof' that others put forth.
Science Fiction is FILLED with amazing examples of undeniable proof that something exists for one character than no one else will believe.
If you (being either the religious or scientific unbeliever) can't accept that someone else is capable of having an experience that transcends what you have either experienced yourself or even believe is possible, then that's a failing on YOUR part.
Okay... that's all. Now back to your regularly scheduled debate.
I can accept that someone else is capable of having an experience that transcends what I have experienced myself, but that person may still be a complete nutjob. Accepting that someone truly believes something is a far cry from respecting said belief system.
The whole religion vs. science debate can be boiled down to two types of people: people that need proof to believe something, and people that don't.
It seems to me that science fiction would attract more of the former, and fantasy would attract more of the latter.
There are probably enough exceptions to this to make it only a very rough correlation, though.
I don't think most people really care. Lewis was good friends with Clarke, there's even a blurb on some of Clarke's books by Lewis, some of which make very "anti-religious" statements.
I'm surprised that in this whole discussion I didn't see any mention of Scientology, though maybe I just missed it ;)
The only difference between SF/F and religions is the credibility that is given to them. If i were to write of a "cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father and can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree he ultimately created," i'd get raped by the critics, to put it lightly. No praising blurbs on my covers!
Maybe in a few thousand years people will believe Heinlein to be the chronicler of the prophet lazarus long, and men will charge to battle screaming "TIME ENOUGH! TIME ENOUGH FOR LOOOOOVE!!!!!"
I seem to recall Joshua Calvert in The Neutronium Alchemist say that he couldn't believe that the universe could exist without some higher purpose. I'm not the most experienced Sci-Fi reader, but thats the only recollection of any reasonably overt religious reference.
Go for the fun Mike Carey one.
We don't need to wait for Heinlein Rodric, we already have L. Ron Hubbard, who's already revealed to us that all sci-fi is just some sort of genetic memory from be enslaved by Xenu for thousands of years.
Philip k dick incorporated religion/chrisianity heavily into his stuff. In more ways than just slamming it I should point out.
Post a Comment